12-27-2011, 06:25 PM
(12-27-2011, 06:18 PM)Sam Wrote: 1. 10 post inactive members is better that pages of spam and bumped posts from last year IMO.
2. I did think to myself earlier that I'll probably make some enemies with this new system, I'm not too fussed.
3. No doubt there will be complaints, whether that be threads or PM's - Users trying to go above me to Omni but again it's better than the LQ spam.
(12-27-2011, 04:51 PM)King Wrote: What happens if they post 10 excellent, quality posts and then decide to keep it up for the next 30 posts. The following 60 might be horrendous. Does that mean Omniscient is going to check each of those 60 posts?
I'm not arguing that it's not a good idea. I think it is. Perhaps it could be a little more effective, but I can't wait to see how this works for SF.
This can happen, but like all other spammers and LQ posters we have a great set of members who actively report posts and threads so it's not a problem.
Users with warnings and bans will not get the feather.
You sure have your work cut out for you Sam. All the best.