05-20-2011, 03:44 PM
Quote:The one you gave me was dated last May 8, 2007. I think my February claim is much more credible. What credible sites state that BitDefender is currently at the top? I wish to see it. I suppose the answers here can't help but to have quite a personal experience touch. I heard you liked BitDefender, and I do like Avira.
Woops, lol you did manage to catch me there, I was looking at the wrong date I believe... But Bitdefender, and Norton are at the top as of 2011.
http://www.cnet.com.au/norton-antivirus-...306321.htm
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/collectio...id_av.html
http://top-10-antivirus.com/
http://anti-virus-software-review.topten...cmpid=4637
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368554,00.asp
Quote:I still think it is. Current malware analysts I know still use it for scanning. Also, aside from being 5 years late, the site you gave has a bad history. I would not trust it. I will not degrade its detection, but the real-time protection certainly has declined.
It's decent, i'll say that. But not as good as it used to be for the updates in malware we have currently (as of today). I didn't mention that site in my list of reliable sources though lol. I only listed the ones that I knew were a reliable source for the finishing statement of my last post.
