(10-08-2010, 03:28 PM)L3g1tWa5te Wrote: Very smart buisness wise, copying off the more successful competition.
More successful? You should take a look at two or three different statistics collections. Because I can tell you right now, Chrome isn't more successful than Firefox.
SiteCatalyst: Firefox (25%), Chrome (7%)
Net Applications: Firefox (22%), Chrome (7%)
W3Counter: Firefox (30%), Chrome (11%)
Stat Owl: Firefox (21%), Chrome (6%)
When taking into consideration the amount of leeway you need to provide usage statistics, I'd say it's still pretty clear Chrome is the underdog here and Firefox is still more successful.
Ho, ho, ho! Well, if it isn't fat stinking billy goat Billy Boy in poison!
How art thou, thou globby bottle of cheap, stinking chip oil?
Come and get one in the yarbles, if ya have any yarbles, you eunuch jelly thou!
How art thou, thou globby bottle of cheap, stinking chip oil?
Come and get one in the yarbles, if ya have any yarbles, you eunuch jelly thou!