There doesn't appear to be a forum for this question so I'll ask it here.
Does anyone know where to find a website or a program that give traffic reports without having to put coding on the page?
Thanks.
Why don't you want to put coding on the pages? Normally all you'd have to do is copy pasta some stuff into your file... I'll look around but no guarantees.
Don't have time to properly read this, but here you go.
http://www.websitetrafficreport.com/
Sorry if its completely unrelated, I'm about to go out.
I just signed up to this one:
http://getclicky.com
Minimal code involved.
This belongs under "website development". And sorry I don't have an answer for you.
Cubestat is just pulling stats from places like Alexa.
Realistically you won't get accurate stats without code on your page.
(10-28-2009, 11:41 PM)Extasey Wrote: [ -> ]Why don't you want to put coding on the pages? Normally all you'd have to do is copy pasta some stuff into your file...
Two reasons. One - the site I want a report on isn't mine. I need it for legal reasons (I'm being impersonated and I need to see who's doing it).
Two - on my own site coding has a habit of delaying the loading of pages on Front Page. I already have a preview of that from the coding from the Copyscape notice.
I'll look at those links, guys. Thanks. And thanks to Omni for pointing to the right fourm. I wasn't sure and reason one above is the reason why I wasn't sure.
(10-29-2009, 02:38 PM)Timelord Wrote: [ -> ]Two - on my own site coding has a habit of delaying the loading of pages on Front Page. I already have a preview of that from the coding from the Copyscape notice.
Thats why you put the tracking code at the bottom of the page, so it is rendered last.
And makes no difference, Tim. While it's loading I can't touch the page until it finishes. It slows editing.
I've checked the links, and it looks like (to my annoyance re the first issue) that Omni was right. I've got buckleys of getting what I want without the coding and Cubestat was as good as useless. The others linked required codes to be placed on the page.
(10-30-2009, 03:27 AM)Timelord Wrote: [ -> ]And makes no difference, Tim. While it's loading I can't touch the page until it finishes. It slows editing.
You won't get the full page until everything has finished but you can at least start viewing the page while it is loading before the script has executed.
Quote:Put Scripts at the Bottom
tag: javascript
The problem caused by scripts is that they block parallel downloads. The HTTP/1.1 specification suggests that browsers download no more than two components in parallel per hostname. If you serve your images from multiple hostnames, you can get more than two downloads to occur in parallel. While a script is downloading, however, the browser won't start any other downloads, even on different hostnames.
In some situations it's not easy to move scripts to the bottom. If, for example, the script uses document.write to insert part of the page's content, it can't be moved lower in the page. There might also be scoping issues. In many cases, there are ways to workaround these situations.
An alternative suggestion that often comes up is to use deferred scripts. The DEFER attribute indicates that the script does not contain document.write, and is a clue to browsers that they can continue rendering. Unfortunately, Firefox doesn't support the DEFER attribute. In Internet Explorer, the script may be deferred, but not as much as desired. If a script can be deferred, it can also be moved to the bottom of the page. That will make your web pages load faster.
Source:
http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html
For this problem, I would refer to Hack Forums.
Good Luck.