who created god.

[Mous]

As I said, the burden of proof doesn't lie with Atheists, the religious people making illogical claims need to prove those claims. It`s just like walking into a court room and saying Stephen Hawkings raped you, you better bring some evidence because that`s a pretty tall tale.

You're just reiterating what you said, maybe you could try answering my question.

Or rather, maybe you should Realize that Atheists aren't exempt from
providing proof. Considering you're basing God's non-existence off logic,
LOGICALLY, there's probably some things in this world that
can't be explains using logic, or things you can't understand by calculation.
So LOGICALLY, providing proof that the above statement isn't true is
needed, and not just some unalienable fact. "God doesn't exist because of
logic" isn't a fact.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument

Try that. That uses logic/reasoning/intuition to deduce the existence of
"God".

---

Mous lol I can agree with whoever I want. Honestly you are quiet annoying lol. Don't post back being arrogant just let people post their opinions, If I want to quote him so be it.

Wow. I'm the one being arrogant, when the only thing you've done
is talk about how science is proving that God doesn't exist,
tell me that I don't know about The Vatican, and I need to "brush up on my
studies" and that my *opinion* is wrong.

Maybe you should follow your own advice before talking any more.

My entire point when I said "Don't agree with him" Is that the entire
thread you've been going on about Science disproving God. He *just8 said not all
Atheists believe in the big bang, therefore, that goes against your original post.
So agreeing with him doesn't help your standpoint at all.