03-12-2011, 09:51 PM
I think he might have meant that even if the post count was at 0, that he wouldn't accept low quality members anyway. I'll change his words to make it make more sense: "Who said that I was going to accept low quality members even if the post count was at 0 or 50? Meeting the requirements doesn't deserve a spot."
Post count isn't related to low or high quality members, you can have 1000 bad or good posts. And even those high quality members with a high post count had to have started with a post count at 0 at some point in time, and they might have also still been a high quality member.
This group has the potential to become a good idea to the forum if people don't abuse it.
Post count isn't related to low or high quality members, you can have 1000 bad or good posts. And even those high quality members with a high post count had to have started with a post count at 0 at some point in time, and they might have also still been a high quality member.
This group has the potential to become a good idea to the forum if people don't abuse it.