who created god.

[Mous]

You attempt to reduce science to something based solely off logic, when plenty of what science has found throughout time has been verified as true in the form of visual evidence that concurs with the prediction made beforehand, you can't equate that to logic alone and you certainly can't equate that to the logic (I use the term loosely) behind a God.

And the thing is, I'm not reducing science to pure logic, I'm saying that science
works in predictable calculations. Which is the essence of science in the first place.
Proving that a specific result happens when X action is initiated in Y order.

Also, YOU can't simply say that "God" can't exist because there isn't
any visual evidence that proves him. As I said WAAAAY back in the
beginning of the thread, if that were the case, there would be no reason
for faith/belief.