Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Low Quality Content..
#45
(05-21-2011, 06:35 AM)Tha Sneak Wrote: I don't quite understand what you're saying.

Advertising SF on HF has its advantages like helping it get started, which has worked quite well.

Ok, SF has started. So end it.

(05-21-2011, 11:33 AM)Gaijin Wrote: Sam, it's not that we're getting off topic, the feather is a feature/award SF doesn't need.
It's actually the first thing that got to go.
Just a thought, how many of you does actually use the twitter feature, I mean did you ever clicked on a users Profile just to see his/her twitter posting.... I never did something like that.
I think the Twitter feature is useless, the SF Twitter page doesn't even get updated that often.

Also locking threads like, Award Nominations and Moderator Applications would be the thing that needs to be done, if there is not need for new Staff, why have it open?
If no one gets an award, why have it open.... o.O

This forum is going in the direction, quantity over quality... obviously... the HQ members can't keep up with the One-Liners that are being posted every Minute, and Staff can't actually do anything since they don't really break rules....
The new Members are mostly posting one-liners, and almost none of them ask for support.

Yes! That is what I'm trying to say.


Messages In This Thread
Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-18-2011, 04:10 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Solidus - 05-18-2011, 04:14 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by h-boy - 05-18-2011, 04:38 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Brandenx781 - 05-18-2011, 04:44 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-18-2011, 04:46 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Brandenx781 - 05-18-2011, 04:55 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-18-2011, 05:02 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by h-boy - 05-18-2011, 05:02 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Brandenx781 - 05-18-2011, 05:11 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-18-2011, 05:10 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-18-2011, 10:41 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-18-2011, 10:50 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-19-2011, 02:16 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-19-2011, 05:35 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Gaijin - 05-19-2011, 06:00 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-19-2011, 06:13 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by h-boy - 05-19-2011, 07:35 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Brandenx781 - 05-19-2011, 01:45 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Jacob - 05-19-2011, 08:45 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-19-2011, 09:07 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Injection - 05-19-2011, 09:10 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-19-2011, 09:44 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Jacob - 05-19-2011, 10:46 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-19-2011, 11:00 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-20-2011, 02:00 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-20-2011, 07:04 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-20-2011, 07:39 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-20-2011, 07:43 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Epicly - 05-20-2011, 07:55 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-20-2011, 08:07 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Epicly - 05-22-2011, 10:04 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-20-2011, 09:01 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Tha Sneak - 05-20-2011, 09:21 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-20-2011, 09:31 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-21-2011, 02:36 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Virtue - 05-21-2011, 04:40 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Gaijin - 05-21-2011, 05:40 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Tha Sneak - 05-21-2011, 06:35 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-21-2011, 05:38 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Sam - 05-21-2011, 06:49 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-21-2011, 09:08 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Gaijin - 05-21-2011, 11:33 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Fragma - 05-21-2011, 11:57 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Cybr - 05-21-2011, 12:10 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by ★Cooldude★ - 05-21-2011, 12:30 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-21-2011, 06:56 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Invincible - 05-21-2011, 08:26 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by F.ate - 05-21-2011, 09:24 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-21-2011, 09:52 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-22-2011, 05:37 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Mao - 05-21-2011, 10:50 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Fragma - 05-22-2011, 06:27 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by :'( - 05-22-2011, 06:28 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-22-2011, 06:37 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Fragma - 05-22-2011, 06:38 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by BlackChaos - 05-22-2011, 06:56 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-22-2011, 07:34 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Mao - 05-24-2011, 02:58 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by WhiteFlame - 05-22-2011, 09:20 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by AceInfinity - 05-22-2011, 12:04 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Quintus - 05-23-2011, 01:13 AM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by G0dfath3r - 05-23-2011, 11:38 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Peter L - 05-24-2011, 12:45 PM
RE: Low Quality Content.. - by Omniscient - 05-24-2011, 12:55 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Ultimate look from quality content paper for your hand Clarencetew24 0 721 05-19-2017, 03:57 AM
Last Post: Clarencetew24
  HF Content Sam 8 2,153 09-10-2011, 10:16 AM
Last Post: Sam
  Invisible low quality posting? WirelessWave 9 1,716 07-13-2010, 07:20 PM
Last Post: Canoris

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)