12-07-2009, 12:34 PM
I am not exactly sure of the nature of this topic, but being a continual thinker; I find it appropriate to confide my philosophies is this forum.
Theorem of Change
As I have observed, change consists of the elements of utilized energy and the object being manipulated, whether intentionally, accidentally, "biotically", or "abiotically"; it is being changed from its previous form -- transformed. This transformation is dubbed simply as "Change". Though the standard dictionary would give many variations of the meaning, it still holds this simple concept as its value.
So, knowing this, I move further into the process of change into the implementations of change. What would transpire due the absence of change? Well, imagine being in a world. Nothing moved, you never thought of anything, you stared but you could not carry a thought. Or even focus on the object of you eye. Actually, there would not be an "existence" at all. The atoms in your body and objects will just cease to exist. So the conclusion of this question is simply: In the gradation of 0 change, there is no "existence".
Now, the other extreme. What would transpire due to 100% change? Well, this is what we call existence. We live it everyday. Everyday change is happening at a incalculable scale; all you can do is control a minute portion of complex systems of change while never fully grasping the magnitude of how much is changing in the seemingly simple implementations of our highly limited power over change. So to this question the conclusion is given: In the gradation of 100% change there exists existence.
And through these 3 points of thought, the 3 conclusions are:
1) Change is the transformation of an object or system of object transformations emulating an object from its previous state.
2) In the gradation of 0 change, there is 0 existence.
3) In the gradation of 100% change, there is existence and there is no existence of anything less then 100% change.
Please, if you have something to modify in my theory or see any fallacies, please post a comment.
Theorem of Change
As I have observed, change consists of the elements of utilized energy and the object being manipulated, whether intentionally, accidentally, "biotically", or "abiotically"; it is being changed from its previous form -- transformed. This transformation is dubbed simply as "Change". Though the standard dictionary would give many variations of the meaning, it still holds this simple concept as its value.
So, knowing this, I move further into the process of change into the implementations of change. What would transpire due the absence of change? Well, imagine being in a world. Nothing moved, you never thought of anything, you stared but you could not carry a thought. Or even focus on the object of you eye. Actually, there would not be an "existence" at all. The atoms in your body and objects will just cease to exist. So the conclusion of this question is simply: In the gradation of 0 change, there is no "existence".
Now, the other extreme. What would transpire due to 100% change? Well, this is what we call existence. We live it everyday. Everyday change is happening at a incalculable scale; all you can do is control a minute portion of complex systems of change while never fully grasping the magnitude of how much is changing in the seemingly simple implementations of our highly limited power over change. So to this question the conclusion is given: In the gradation of 100% change there exists existence.
And through these 3 points of thought, the 3 conclusions are:
1) Change is the transformation of an object or system of object transformations emulating an object from its previous state.
2) In the gradation of 0 change, there is 0 existence.
3) In the gradation of 100% change, there is existence and there is no existence of anything less then 100% change.
Please, if you have something to modify in my theory or see any fallacies, please post a comment.